Annotating Social Acts: Authority Claims and Alignment Moves in Wikipedia Talk Pages

نویسندگان

  • Emily M. Bender
  • Jonathan T. Morgan
  • Meghan Oxley
  • Mark Zachry
  • Brian Hutchinson
  • Alex Marin
  • Bin Zhang
  • Mari Ostendorf
چکیده

We present the AAWD corpus, a collection of 365 discussions drawn from Wikipedia talk pages and annotated with labels capturing two kinds of social acts: alignment moves and authority claims. We describe these social acts and our annotation process, and analyze the resulting data set for interactions between participant status and social acts and between the social acts themselves.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are We There Yet?: The Development of a Corpus Annotated for Social Acts in Multilingual Online Discourse

We present the AAWD and AACD corpora, a collection of discussions drawn from Wikipedia talk pages and small group IRC discussions in English, Russian and Mandarin. Our datasets are annotated with labels capturing two kinds of social acts: alignment moves and authority claims. We describe these social acts, discuss our annotation process, highlight challenges we encountered and strategies we emp...

متن کامل

Behind the Article: Recognizing Dialog Acts in Wikipedia Talk Pages

In this paper, we propose an annotation schema for the discourse analysis of Wikipedia Talk pages aimed at the coordination efforts for article improvement. We apply the annotation schema to a corpus of 100 Talk pages from the Simple English Wikipedia and make the resulting dataset freely available for download1. Furthermore, we perform automatic dialog act classification on Wikipedia discussio...

متن کامل

The inclusivity of Wikipedia and the drawing of expert boundaries: An examination of talk pages and reference lists

Wikipedia is frequently viewed as an inclusive medium. But inclusivity within this online encyclopedia is not a simple matter of just allowing anyone to contribute. In its quest for legitimacy as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia relies on outsiders to judge claims championed by rival editors. In choosing these experts, Wikipedians define the boundaries of acceptable comment on any given subject. Incl...

متن کامل

Annotation of Adversarial and Collegial Social Actions in Discourse

We posit that determining the social goals and intentions of dialogue participants is crucial for understanding discourse taking place on social media. In particular, we examine the social goals of being collegial and being adversarial. Through our early experimentation, we found that speech and dialogue acts are not able to capture the complexities and nuances of the social intentions of disco...

متن کامل

Normative behaviour in Wikipedia

This paper contributes to the debate about governance behaviour in on-line communities, particularly those associated with Open Source. It addresses evidence of normative self-regulation by analysing the discussion pages of a sample of Wikipedia Controversial and Featured articles. The assumption is that attempts by editors to influence one another within these pages will be revealed by their u...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011